Your offering is ready for prime time. The story isn't. The clock is running.
Is the offering ready, but not the story?
In plain terms: You have a great offering, and are struggling to turn buyers' light bulbs on. It happens because you're forcing traditional buyers to translate your features and vision into how it impacts them. Every month you don't nail the story is burn against a finite clock.
THE PROBLEM
Your growth is carried by a few heroes and a few buyers who "get it."
Neither scales. Neither is in your control. Neither is predictable.
YOUR BUYERS
86%
of B2B purchases stall during the buying process.
A slice of your ICP maps your capabilities to their problems, with conviction, on their own. You'll run out of them.
FORRESTER, STATE OF BUSINESS BUYING, 2024
- A demo went well and then nothing happened, and you cannot say where it stopped.
- You have closed a handful of deals and every one of them was to a buyer who already knew they had the problem.
- You are hiring your first salesperson and you cannot yet write down what they are supposed to say.
- The next raise is going to be priced off traction, and the story has not produced it yet.
- Every deal still runs through you.
Why this happens: you are selling to the second group as if they were the first
Early adopters translate your features into their required capabilities and figure out the impact unaided. That is why your first customers loved it: they did the translation for you, and the pitch never had to do that job. They too, had your vision.Later stage buyers do not work that way. They need the problem framed, the solution framed, and the risk taken off the table before they will act. A pitch built for people who self-translate gives them none of that. So the demo goes well, because it is interesting, and then nothing happens. The fix is an inversion: the problem comes first, the solution and mitigating implementation risk come second, and only then does the product come third.
Runway
Cycles stretch, and they stretch against runway raised on a faster plan.
Revenue
Pipeline is not converting.
Risk
The only closes are to buyers who self-diagnosed, so pipeline cannot be forecast or scaled.
Runway
Every conversation runs through the founder, so growth is capped at one person's calendar.
Cost
The roadmap gets pulled toward whatever the last confused prospect asked for.
Runway
The next round gets priced off traction the story never produced.
The one thing I have to say before you read any further
If the product does not solve a problem someone will pay to have solved, messaging cannot fix it and neither can I.
What you would need
- A way to describe what we do that starts with the buyer's problem, not our product.
- A conversation my team can run without me in the room.
- Language that works on someone who has never thought about this before.
- A fast way to tell who will never get it, so we stop spending on them.
- One story across the site, the deck and the conversation.
What you would measure
- The share of first meetings where the buyer articulates the problem back unprompted
- time from first meeting to a second meeting with a new person in the room
- the proportion of pipeline sourced by someone other than the founder
- demo-to-next-step conversion
- deals lost to “no decision” versus lost to a competitor: the first is a translation failure, the second is a real loss.
Three reasons this works
One Message Foundation Serving All Conversational ChannelsOne foundation, built once, that answers four questions: the problems you solve, who owns the problem, how you solve them in a relevant, differentiated manner, and why someone who does not know you will believe you. Note the order: the problem comes first and the product comes third. That inversion is the big fix at this stage.
Runway: a stranger can follow it, so the cycle is not spent teaching people what category you are in. Cost: one build instead of a website story, a deck story and a room story that have to be reconciled later. Risk: you can tell whether a bad meeting was a content problem or the wrong buyer, because there is one thing to test.
Built for Your Motion, Not Delivered From a BinderThe conversation is co-created with you and whoever is actually selling, in your words, against your live deals. A generic framework fails fastest here, because at this stage there is no volume to absorb a bad fit.
Runway: no cycle spent adapting somebody else's template to a market that does not exist yet in their examples. Risk: the person who has to run the conversation helped build it, so it survives first contact with a real buyer. Cost: one build, done against your actual deals rather than a case study.
Works at Every AltitudeThe same person sits with the founder on positioning and then sits in the two-person sales team's actual calls. At this size that is not a convenience. It is the only way the language survives the trip from the whiteboard to a buyer.
Runway: the positioning gets corrected by real calls in weeks rather than by a churned quarter. Risk: nobody hands you a deck and leaves before it meets a buyer. Cost: one person instead of a positioning consultant plus a sales advisor, with no translation loss between them.
Questions people ask
How do I know whether it's my pitch or my market?
The test I use is what your fast closes had in common. Walk me through the last deal that closed quickly: what did they already believe before they met you? If every fast close came from a buyer who had already diagnosed the problem themselves, you have not proven GTM Fit. You have found the small population who did your translation for you, and the pitch has not yet been asked to do its job. That is a pitch problem, and it is fixable. If the buyers who fully understood it still would not pay, that is a market answer, and no amount of messaging changes it.
We are pre-revenue. Is it too early for this?
Sometimes, and I will tell you. The hard boundary is above: if the product does not solve a problem someone will pay to have solved, messaging cannot fix it. But if buyers who understand it want it, and the problem is that too few of them get there, then this is exactly the moment.
We are a small team and we cannot afford a consultant. What does this look like commercially?
This is typically a few days of strategic narrative work rather than a program. On the commercial side I am flexible with companies at this stage and prepared to be: mixed fees that combine fixed, performance or variable elements, and equity where the mission and the people are right.
Can't we just hire a salesperson?
You can, and it is usually the expensive version of this experiment. A salesperson who arrives before there is a story that works on a stranger has to invent one. The question I would ask first is who on your team could run the whole conversation today, start to finish. If the answer is nobody, a hire does not fix that. It adds a second person who also cannot, and now you are paying for the discovery twice.
If a stranger could hear it once and describe it back to you correctly, what would that change first?
Twelve months out, someone other than you is having these conversations. I am interested in who that is.
Start a conversationGet Started